A Decade of Open Access at the Gates Foundation: Evolving Toward Equity and Innovation

Redacción HC
06/03/2025

In 2015, the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation took a bold step to reshape scientific publishing by launching a mandatory open access (OA) policy. Aimed at democratizing access to knowledge, the initiative required that all research funded by the foundation be made freely available under a Creative Commons license (CC BY). Now, ten years later, a retrospective look reveals a dynamic journey marked by experimentation, evidence-based adaptation, and the pursuit of inclusive, sustainable publishing.

Ashley Farley, a senior officer in Knowledge and Research Services at the Gates Foundation, offers an in-depth analysis of this policy’s evolution in her 2025 article for Insights: The UKSG Journal. Her piece not only documents the successes and shortcomings of the foundation’s approach but also provides actionable insights for institutions navigating similar challenges.

From Mandate to Model: The Policy’s Evolution

The original 2015 policy focused on Gold OA, requiring immediate open publication with a CC BY license. However, the foundation soon recognized that access alone wasn’t enough—cost, equity, and transparency needed attention too.

Key Milestones:

• 2015: Launch of the OA mandate; baseline of 986 openly accessible articles.
• 2017: Introduction of Gates Open Research (GOR), a publishing platform based on post-publication peer review, developed in partnership with F1000Research.
• 2021: Alignment with Plan S principles—adding repository mandates and restricting high APCs (article processing charges) in hybrid journals.
• 2025: New policy revision underway, emphasizing global inclusion and regional equity, particularly for researchers in low- and middle-income countries.

“Our approach has evolved through continuous learning,” writes Farley, stressing that experimentation and responsiveness are key to success.

Results and Impact: More Than Just Numbers

The transformation is evident not only in publication counts, which doubled between 2015 and 2017, but also in the philosophy of knowledge dissemination:

• GOR’s post-publication review model accelerates sharing while enhancing transparency and accountability.
• Repository mandates reinforce preservation and accessibility outside paywalls.
• Policy flexibility allows adjustments based on evidence, ensuring adaptability to global developments in scholarly communication.

These shifts highlight the foundation’s dual commitment: maximizing research impact while ensuring the global scientific community—particularly the Global South—has equitable opportunities to contribute and benefit.

Challenges Faced and Lessons Learned

Despite progress, the path hasn’t been without obstacles:

• Financial barriers remain high for some researchers, particularly where APCs are unaffordable or unsupported.
• Publisher negotiations are complex, requiring strategic engagement to avoid exploitative agreements.
• Impact assessment is ongoing; while output has increased, long-term benefits for underserved regions still require more data.

“Equity in open access is more than availability—it’s about who gets to publish, where, and how,” Farley notes.

Toward a Global, Inclusive Future for Open Access

The Gates Foundation’s experience offers a replicable model for funders and institutions seeking to move beyond legacy publishing paradigms. Its core strategy: policy informed by real-world data, iterative adaptation, and inclusive design.

Policy Recommendations from the Author:

1. Use experimentation as a driver: Pilot new models, measure outcomes, and refine policies accordingly.
2. Support innovative OA platforms: Tools like GOR offer scalable, transparent publishing alternatives.
3. Promote equitable financing: Introduce regional pricing models or support Diamond OA, which removes fees for both authors and readers.
4. Enhance inclusion efforts: Prioritize support for researchers from low- and middle-income countries.
5. Collaborate across the ecosystem: Work with funders, publishers, and research communities to drive change collectively.

These steps reflect a paradigm shift—from one-size-fits-all mandates to context-sensitive policies that adapt to regional realities and technological change.

Why It Matters: Implications for the Global Research Landscape

The article underscores that OA is not a checkbox—it's a continuous commitment. As governments, institutions, and other funders seek to fulfill the promise of open science, the Gates Foundation’s experience provides a living case study in how to do it thoughtfully and at scale.

Real-World Applications:

• Public health research becomes more impactful when accessible to practitioners and policymakers worldwide.
• Educational institutions in developing countries gain free access to high-quality, peer-reviewed knowledge.
• Researchers outside traditional power centers find new avenues to publish and collaborate.

Conclusion: Open Access, Evolved

Ten years on, the Gates Foundation’s journey shows that open access policy is not static—it’s an evolving ecosystem. By leveraging data, partnerships, and a commitment to equity, the foundation has helped reimagine what publishing can look like in the 21st century.

As the research community confronts the twin challenges of rising publication costs and unequal access, the call to action is clear: embrace adaptive, inclusive policies that reflect the values of a truly open and just scientific enterprise.

Topics of interest