Redacción HC
24/08/2023
Since 2015, Peru's public secondary schools have operated under the Jornada Escolar Completa (JEC) policy, which adds approximately 10 extra hours of instruction per week. The goal is clear: to bridge learning gaps and improve outcomes in core subjects like Mathematics. But does more time in class necessarily translate to better learning?
A study by Diego López Motta from the Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos offers an ethnographic perspective on this question, shifting the focus from policy intentions to student experiences. The research examines how JEC affects learning, motivation, and aspirations across two very different urban school settings in Lima.
The study was conducted in two secondary schools with contrasting socioeconomic contexts:
Using participant observation and semi-structured interviews, the researcher spent three months embedded in classrooms, observing teaching practices and gathering feedback from fifth-year students and a Mathematics teacher. The study aimed to capture students' own interpretations of how JEC shaped their educational experience.
While the sample size was small and limited to two institutions, the ethnographic approach allowed for deep insights into classroom dynamics and students’ lived realities—insights often missing from standardized testing data.
In School A, students welcomed the additional time. They reported:
These findings suggest that JEC can have a transformative effect in schools where previously, instructional time and quality were limited.
In contrast, students in School B expressed dissatisfaction. Although they had more Mathematics classes, they didn’t perceive improvements in the quality of instruction. Their main concern: the curriculum remained basic and did not align with the demands of university entrance exams.
Despite an “active” classroom environment—group activities, whiteboard exercises, and visual experiments—students felt the extra time wasn’t being used effectively to deepen learning or prepare them for academic challenges ahead.
The study echoes international findings: more instructional hours do not automatically improve learning outcomes. According to the World Bank (2016) and similar studies in Chile, Brazil, and Guatemala, extended hours work best when paired with targeted pedagogy, strong leadership, and contextual adaptation.
The research found that the local implementation of JEC depended heavily on:
In schools with a strong institutional culture and active leadership, JEC was more likely to yield positive results. In others, the policy risked becoming an administrative burden with little educational payoff.
López Motta emphasizes that expanding school hours must go hand-in-hand with systemic improvements, including:
The study recommends building a dual-track model within JEC:
Importantly, teachers must be equipped not just to fill more hours, but to deliver content with relevance, rigor, and responsiveness to student needs.
JEC is a policy with transformative potential—but implementation is everything. This study underscores that the success of education reforms relies not just on time or resources, but on how they are deployed and perceived by the people they aim to serve.
Educational success cannot be measured by seat time alone. What matters most is what happens in the classroom—and whether it resonates with students' goals, realities, and aspirations.
Topics of interest
EducationReference: López Motta D. Efectos de la Jornada Escolar Completa sobre el aprendizaje de los estudiantes. Rev ConCiencia EPG [Internet]. 2021;6(2). Available on: https://doi.org/10.32654/CONCIENCIAEPG.6-2.3
![]()