Redacción HC
23/01/2025
Understanding how long carbon remains stored in ecosystems is essential to designing effective climate strategies. While tropical forests are widely recognized for their ability to absorb large quantities of CO₂, what remains less known is how long that carbon stays put — especially in undisturbed environments. A recent study published in Biogeosciences offers a rare glimpse into this question, providing empirical estimates of carbon residence time in one of the most intact forest regions of the Amazon.
Led by Ingrid Chanca, Susan Trumbore, Carlos Quesada, and a multinational team of researchers, this investigation used radiocarbon dating techniques to reveal how carbon behaves differently in the biomass versus soil of a near-pristine Amazonian forest. The findings have wide-ranging implications for climate policy, ecological restoration, and how we model the Earth’s carbon cycle.
Tropical forests like the Amazon play a dual role in the carbon cycle — both as absorbers of atmospheric CO₂ and as massive storage reservoirs. But how durable is this storage?
The core question the study asked was: How long does carbon remain in a forest ecosystem once it's captured?
Using radiocarbon analysis, researchers were able to estimate the mean residence time (MRT) of carbon in two main compartments: biomass (like leaves and branches) and soils. The team collected samples from an undisturbed forest in central Amazonia, an area unaffected by logging, fire, or agriculture.
Researchers gathered material from living vegetation — including leaves and woody tissues — and extracted soil cores at varying depths.
Using accelerator mass spectrometry (AMS), they quantified the radiocarbon content of each sample. Because ¹⁴C decays over time, it provides a “clock” to estimate how long carbon has been stored since fixation from the atmosphere.
To interpret these data, the study applied carbon transit and residence time models — tracking how long carbon particles linger in different compartments. The approach also distinguished between short-term and long-term carbon pools.
“Carbon in ecosystems doesn’t move uniformly. Some molecules exit quickly; others persist for centuries.”
Living plant matter had a mean residence time of 5–10 years. Leaves fall, decompose, and are quickly replaced — a process aligned with expectations for tropical ecosystems.
In contrast, soil samples revealed carbon ages from 50 years in the top 10 cm to over 150 years at depths of 30–50 cm. This highlights the Amazon’s deep subsoil as a slow-cycling carbon sink, largely isolated from short-term changes.
Soil carbon showed a wide distribution of residence times, with both recent and ancient carbon coexisting. This confirms that some soil layers act as temporary buffers, while deeper layers serve as long-term reservoirs.
“What lies beneath the surface may hold the key to climate resilience.”
These findings align with studies in other tropical forests, reinforcing the notion that soil is the most persistent component of terrestrial carbon storage. However, the study’s focus on a near-pristine site provides one of the clearest empirical pictures to date.
Many climate strategies, including REDD+ and national carbon offset programs, focus on preserving trees. But this study suggests protecting soil carbon is equally critical, especially in regions where subsoil processes are not well represented in carbon accounting systems.
“Policymakers must look belowground — not just at canopy coverage — when designing carbon budgets.”
Countries like Brazil, Peru, and Colombia, with large Amazonian territories, should consider long-term soil dynamics in carbon neutrality plans.
Efforts to restore degraded land or reforest cleared areas must factor in the time lag involved in rebuilding carbon stocks — especially in soils. Restoration isn’t just about planting trees; it’s about waiting decades for soils to recover their carbon-holding capacity.
Incorporating depth-explicit soil carbon turnover into Earth system models will lead to more accurate predictions of how forests respond to climate change and land use. The study recommends integrating empirical residence time data into national inventories and dynamic global vegetation models.
The team proposes several steps to build on their findings:
“There’s no climate solution that ignores the deep soil.”
While carbon fluxes are often measured in tons per hectare, this study highlights time as an equally vital dimension. Fast cycling in biomass may give the illusion of activity, but true stability lies underground, in the slow churn of centuries-old carbon.
For nations aiming for long-term sustainability, understanding this hidden timeline is not just academic — it’s strategic.
The Amazon forest holds many secrets, but one of its most important is how deep time and deep soil protect the climate. As debates rage over deforestation and offsets, studies like this remind us: what happens underground matters as much as what grows above.
Policymakers, modelers, and conservationists would do well to heed this message — and adjust strategies accordingly.
Topics of interest
ClimateReferencia: Chanca I, Levin I, Trumbore S, Macario K, Lavric J, Quesada CA, de Araújo AC, Dias Júnior CQ, van Asperen H, Hammer S, Sierra CA. How long does carbon stay in a near-pristine central Amazon forest? An empirical estimate with radiocarbon. Biogeosciences. 2025;22(2):455–473. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-22-455-2025.
![]()