Microplastics in Human Blood: A Wake-Up Call for Global Health


Español
Sangre humana con glóbulos rojos, células T (naranja) y plaquetas (verde)
Sangre humana con glóbulos rojos, células T (naranja) y plaquetas (verde)
ZEISS Microscopy

For the first time in scientific history, researchers have confirmed the presence of microplastic particles in human blood. This groundbreaking study, published in Environment International in 2022, sheds light on a worrying dimension of plastic pollution — one that goes far beyond oceans and food chains and into the very fluid that sustains human life.

Conducted by a Dutch research team led by Heather A. Leslie and colleagues from Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, the study analyzed blood samples from healthy adults using advanced analytical techniques. The findings? Plastic particles were detected in 77% of the participants, providing direct evidence that microplastics can circulate through our bodies. While the long-term health implications remain unclear, the study underscores the urgency of rethinking our plastic-dependent lifestyles and policies.

A Breakthrough in Microplastic Research

From Pollution to Bloodstream

Microplastics — particles smaller than 5 mm — have been found in marine animals, drinking water, air, and even human feces and placental tissue. However, until now, there was no conclusive evidence that plastic particles could enter and circulate in the human bloodstream.

This pilot study answers that question with a resounding yes. By using double-shot pyrolysis gas chromatography/mass spectrometry (Py-GC/MS), the researchers detected and quantified plastic polymers equal to or greater than 700 nanometers in size within full blood samples.

How the Study Was Conducted

Twenty-two healthy volunteers donated blood under strict contamination-free conditions. The researchers measured the mass (not number) of plastic particles and screened for common polymers such as:

  • Polyethylene terephthalate (PET) – found in water bottles and textiles
  • Polystyrene (PS) – used in foam packaging and containers
  • Polyethylene (PE) – found in plastic bags and food wrappers
  • Polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) – used in coatings and resins
  • Polypropylene (PP) – common in packaging and textiles (not detected in this study)

The average concentration of plastic detected was 1.6 micrograms per milliliter of blood, with wide individual variation.

What Was Found in the Blood?

Prevalence and Polymer Types

Out of the 22 participants, 17 had detectable levels of plastic in their blood. The most frequently identified polymers were:

  • PET in 50% of samples
  • Polystyrene in 36%
  • Polyethylene in 23%
  • PMMA in one donor

Polypropylene was not detected in any of the samples.

These results confirm that commonly used consumer plastics are making their way into human circulation, likely through ingestion (food and water), inhalation (airborne particles), and possibly through skin exposure.

A New Understanding of Bioaccessibility

One of the study’s most striking implications is the bioaccessibility of plastic particles — their ability to cross biological barriers and enter the bloodstream. This finding raises a new set of questions about the potential for microplastics to accumulate in organs such as the liver, spleen, kidneys, or even the brain. The human body may not eliminate these particles as quickly as they are absorbed, opening the door to long-term toxicity.

Implications for Health and Policy

Not Just an Environmental Issue

Plastic pollution is no longer just about wildlife or ocean ecosystems. This discovery elevates the issue to the realm of public health, highlighting the need for urgent action in air quality regulation, water purification, and plastic exposure guidelines in consumer products.

Public health experts are now grappling with how to assess chronic exposure risks, especially for vulnerable populations like children, pregnant women, and those with compromised health.

What Comes Next?

The researchers call for:

  1. Larger-scale studies involving diverse populations
  2. Inclusion of smaller particles (<700 nm) in future analyses
  3. Tracking of biological markers to study inflammation, oxidative stress, or toxic effects
  4. Stronger regulations on air and water microplastic content
  5. Establishment of safety thresholds for plastic polymers in human biological systems

The findings also signal a need for clinical awareness. Healthcare professionals may soon need to consider environmental plastic exposure in diagnostics and preventive strategies.

Conclusion: A New Chapter in Plastic Pollution

The discovery of microplastics in human blood forces a reevaluation of how deeply plastic has penetrated our environment and, now, our biology. While the health implications remain uncertain, the presence of plastic in the bloodstream represents a potential global health risk that demands urgent investigation and policy action.

The study is a call to scientists, governments, and the general public: the age of invisible plastic exposure is here, and its full impact is only beginning to unfold. Limiting our plastic footprint now may be the only way to prevent long-term consequences for human health.


Topics of interest

Pollution Health

Reference: Leslie HA, van Velzen MJM, Brandsma SH, Vethaak AD, Garcia-Vallejo JJ, Lamoree MH. Discovery and quantification of plastic particle pollution in human blood. Environ Int. 2022;163:107199. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2022.107199

License

Creative Commons license 4.0. Read our license terms and conditions
Beneficios de publicar

Latest Updates

Figure.
How Forest Age Shapes the Global Carbon Balance
Figure.
Rewriting E. coli’s Genome: A New Biotech Path to Tackle Nanoplastic Pollution
Figure.
Amazon at risk: deforestation, not just climate change, drives rainfall loss