Microplastics in the Classroom: What We're Really Breathing Indoors

Redacción HC
20/06/2024

The term microplastics often conjures images of polluted oceans and marine wildlife in distress. But new research shows these tiny plastic particles are not confined to beaches or waterways—they're present in the very air we breathe, especially in indoor environments like university classrooms. A study published in Discover Environment (2024) reveals the silent accumulation of microplastics in indoor dust, with potential implications for human health, especially in places where students and staff spend long hours each day.

University Classrooms: A Surprising Reservoir of Plastic Dust

Indoor air has become a key frontier in environmental health. People spend up to 90% of their lives indoors, often unaware of the contaminants suspended around them. While prior studies have examined microplastics in homes and offices, this is the first to focus on classrooms at the university level, where exposure is chronic and ventilation often limited.

Led by Mansoor Ahmad Bhat of Discover Environment (India), the study sought to answer a pressing question: What types of microplastics are settling in classrooms, and where do they come from?

A Closer Look: Methodology and Analysis

The research team collected settled dust samples from four classrooms using passive filters, analyzing both their physical and chemical characteristics.

Physical Identification

• Morphology: Nearly all microplastics were fibrous, ranging in length from 120 µm to over 2,200 µm—small enough to be inhaled or ingested.
• Color diversity: Fibers appeared in various shades—black, blue, red, and transparent—suggesting multiple sources such as clothing, stationery, and synthetic upholstery.

Chemical Characterization

• µ-Raman spectroscopy identified 11 distinct polymer types, including polyamide 6 (PA6), polypropylene (PP), and polyamide 12 (PA12)—commonly used in textiles and consumer products.
• SEM–EDX (Scanning Electron Microscopy with Energy Dispersive X-ray Spectroscopy) revealed dominant elements like carbon (C), fluorine (F), and oxygen (O), along with trace metals such as gold (Au) and calcium (Ca)—some possibly originating from chemical additives or environmental deposition.

Statistical Insights

• The number of polymer types varied among classrooms: 9, 9, 13, and 12 respectively.
• ANOVA testing showed statistically significant differences (p = 0.03), hinting at the role of localized conditions like room usage, ventilation, and cleaning practices.

"The variation in microplastic content among classrooms points to indoor activity patterns as a key driver," the authors note.

Key Findings: Fibers, Fluorine, and More

This study paints a detailed portrait of indoor microplastic contamination:

1. Microplastic Dominance: Fibers overwhelmingly dominated the samples, reinforcing findings from similar studies in homes and offices (e.g., Dris et al., Zhang et al.).
2. Chemical Footprint: The presence of fluorinated compounds—potentially from performance textiles or chemical treatments—adds another layer of concern, as some fluorine-based substances are known to be persistent and bioaccumulative.
3. Room-to-Room Variability: Differences among classrooms indicate that microplastic load is not uniform, and can be influenced by how a space is cleaned, ventilated, and used.
4. Novel Characterization Techniques: By combining µ-Raman and SEM–EDX, this is one of the few studies to offer high-resolution polymer identification and surface elemental analysis, enhancing the reliability of results.

Why This Matters: Health, Policy, and Prevention

Although the study stops short of assessing health outcomes, the implications are hard to ignore:

Public Health Considerations

• With prolonged exposure in poorly ventilated classrooms, there's a risk of inhalation or ingestion of microplastics, some of which may carry toxic additives or heavy metals.
• Fibers of the size found in this study (120–2,200 µm) are large enough to be inhaled and small enough to bypass certain respiratory filters, raising concerns especially for vulnerable populations like asthmatics.

Institutional and Policy Responses

• Universities and schools should reassess their cleaning protocols, opting for wet dusting, HEPA filtration, and avoiding dry sweeping that redistributes fibers.
• Reducing the use of synthetic fabrics in classroom furnishings could lower fiber shedding.
• Ventilation systems should be evaluated for their ability to trap or expel microplastic particles.

"These findings are a wake-up call for educational institutions to take indoor air quality seriously," Bhat concludes.

Global Relevance: From India to Latin America

Though the study took place in India, its findings resonate worldwide. In Latin American cities like Lima, Mexico City, or Bogotá, similar conditions—dense urban air, synthetic fabrics, poor ventilation—are common in educational institutions.

This makes the case for replicating such studies across geographies, adjusting for local infrastructure and behavioral norms. The data could shape:

• Design codes for healthier classrooms
• Regulations on building materials
• Awareness campaigns for students and staff

Conclusion: Our Learning Environments Need a Cleanup

We may think of classrooms as spaces for learning, but they are also ecosystems of invisible pollutants. This study adds microplastics to the growing list of indoor contaminants that deserve urgent attention. With the right interventions—from material choices to maintenance policies—universities can minimize plastic exposure and foster safer environments for education.

The microscopic dust beneath your desk may seem harmless—but it's time we look closer.

Topics of interest

Pollution Health Education Academia