Redacción HC
04/09/2024
In an era where plastic pollution is recognized as a planetary health crisis, the discovery of microplastics in unexpected places continues to unsettle scientists—and now, the human brain joins that list. A groundbreaking study from researchers at the University of New Mexico, Oklahoma State University, and the New Mexico Office of the Medical Investigator presents disturbing evidence: microplastics are not just in our oceans, food, or lungs—they’ve also infiltrated our brains.
Published as a preprint in 2024, this study is the first to quantify microplastics in post-mortem brain tissue using high-resolution chemical analysis. Its implications extend far beyond environmental science—touching on neurology, toxicology, and public health.
While micro and nanoplastics (MNPs) have already been detected in the placenta, lungs, and bloodstream, the human brain has remained, until now, a largely unexplored frontier. This study set out to answer two pivotal questions: Are microplastics accumulating in brain tissue? And if so, is this accumulation increasing over time?
The results not only confirm the presence of MNPs in the human brain, but also show a significant rise in their concentration over the past eight years. The researchers warn that this trend could pose serious risks to cognitive health, especially given the brain’s vulnerability to environmental toxins.
The researchers analyzed post-mortem samples from 2016 and 2024, obtained during autopsies in Albuquerque, New Mexico. They examined tissue from the frontal cortex, liver, and kidney of deceased individuals.
Still, this study sets a new benchmark in chemical precision and scale, offering the first robust quantification of plastic in human brain tissue.
In 2024, the average concentration of microplastics in brain tissue reached 4,806 µg/g, with some samples peaking at 8,861 µg/g. This is 7–10 times higher than levels found in the liver and kidneys, which remained below 667 µg/g.
“We were stunned by the magnitude of accumulation in the brain,” the authors report.
All organs studied showed rising levels of MNPs over the eight-year period:
This 57% average increase in brain microplastics reflects both rising environmental exposure and possibly enhanced permeability of brain tissue to nano-sized particles.
Of all polymers identified, polyethylene—commonly used in plastic bags and packaging—made up 74% of brain MNPs, compared to 44–57% in other organs.
Using TEM, researchers confirmed that most particles were <200 nm, aged, and irregularly shaped—not the spherical beads often used in laboratory studies. These characteristics suggest long-term environmental degradation before bodily absorption.
The findings suggest that microplastics can cross the blood-brain barrier or exploit alternative entry routes such as the olfactory nerve. The brain’s high lipid content and vascular density may make it especially vulnerable to accumulation.
The exponential rise of microplastics in brain tissue reinforces the urgency of:
Key next steps include:
Governments and institutions must:
The presence of plastic in the most vital and protected organ of the human body raises ethical questions: How much should we tolerate? What obligations do corporations and governments have to prevent further harm?
“Every gram of microplastic in the brain is an indictment of our failure to regulate invisible pollutants,” the study implies.
The discovery of microplastics in human brains should serve as a global wake-up call. It's no longer a matter of “out of sight, out of mind.” These particles have breached our final biological frontier.
Immediate action is needed—from scientific inquiry and healthcare preparedness to environmental reforms and lifestyle changes. If our brains are now plasticized, we must ask: what future are we building—and can we still reshape it?
Topics of interest
HealthReferencia: Campen M, Nihart A, Garcia M. Bioaccumulation of Microplastics in Decedent Human Brains Assessed by Pyrolysis Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry. Preprint. 2024. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-4345687/v1